2015年6月14日星期日

虛構的黑金買票

港台:梁國雄指有中間人買票但銀碼屬他個人虛構 (15:48)

社民連立法會議員梁國雄昨稱有人提出以1億元交換,希望他在政改投贊成票。不過香港電台今午引述梁國雄指,有關銀碼只是他個人虛構,但強調今年2月的確有中間人接觸他。

梁國雄說,有關中間人無談及價錢,但表示可以開出一個令他「兩世無憂」的價錢,換取他投票支持政改。報道又引述梁國雄解釋,如果不將銀碼說成1億元,就不能吸引傳媒刊登。

記者致電梁國雄查詢,但暫未收到回覆。報道引述梁國雄表示,明日會在立法會見記者交代。

(14/6/2015明報即時新聞)

近日黑金買票傳聞甚囂塵上,信它的人智慧一定有問題,要收買親共那幫人,輸送利益一點也不出奇,要收買泛民,風險大到不值得這樣做。就算不講銀碼,已足以構成企圖賄賂公職人員,誰肯做中間人以身犯險?尤其是這些議員動輒就去報廉署,沒有十足把握,也不會有人嘗試去探口風,除非……

梁國雄慣收黑金,中間人是相熟到肯定不會被舉報的,而梁國雄正在盤算叫個甚麽下一世都無憂的價錢,否則的話一早就扮作就犯,暗中錄下對話,假意應承,收集足夠證據,發出暗號,埋伏的廉署人員立即現身拉人。梁國雄怎會便宜了中間人?

另一個可能性就是,這些傳聞或像梁國雄自爆的講法全部都是謊言,都是他們杜撰的政治把戲。這幫議員,包括建制派,公信力已稀少,再搞小丑動作,更加為港人唾棄。唾棄當然無傷大雅,反正選那一個可能都只是兩害而取其輕,你憎厭親共的,就胡亂投給反共的,到頭來都是一丘之貉,有多少人真正揀得落手?

30 則留言:

  1. 標少, 其實長毛除了誠信破產(當然一向都接近零)外, 還有法律方面的手尾嗎?
    否則他日一選舉, 個個泛民日日都明示暗示于中央想包養自己下三世,
    退一步, 就算真的不犯法, 民主精神都蕩然無存

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 無手尾喎,只不過是對公眾講大話,搞政治的人有幾多個唔會講吖?

      刪除
    2. Could any LegCo members be arrested so that they cannot vote on Wednesday when the government tries to pass the bill? Or would they be covered by Immunities under Cap.382 ?

      刪除
    3. I opine that S.5 Cap 382 does not apply if the Legco member commits a criminal offence before attending a sitting. Freedom from arrest only applies while the member is attending a sitting. If Leung kills someone or indecently assaults someone on his way to the Legco meeting, he is not immuned from arrest. If you compare S.5(a) and (b), you can see there is less constraint for the criminal arrest. On the other hand, you need 2/3 of the total number of Legco members instead of 2/3 of the members present to pass this particular bill in accordance with the requirement stipulated in the Basic Law.

      刪除
    4. Timothy seems to have misunderstood the position. The government needs at least 47 "yes" votes to pass the bill. An absent LegCo member or a "no"/"abstain" vote makes no difference.

      In other words, if only 47 LegCo members are present and they all vote "yes", the bill will be passed.

      刪除
  2. 其實算不算公開叫价,暗示一億唔夠,除非畀夠兩億啦。如此公開叫价又是否已經觸犯防止賄賂條例?

    回覆刪除
  3. 别多想,只是政治把戲,何必認真?

    回覆刪除
  4. 我想求教標少, 有評論認為長毛有機會犯了公職人員行為失當和刑事誹謗罪, 只是長毛政敵順口開河還是真有入罪可能?

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 公職人員行為失當的五大元素:

      (1) a public official;
      (2) in the course of or in relation to his public office;
      (3) wilfully misconducts himself by act or omission (for example, by wilfully neglecting or failing to perform his duty);
      (4) without reasonable excuse or justification; and where
      (5) such misconduct is serious, not trivial, having regard to the responsibilities of the office and the office-holder, the importance of the public objects which they serve and the nature and extent of the departure from those responsibilities.

      梁國雄的謊言未符要求,不能立案。至於誹謗,請問他誹謗誰?

      刪除
    2. (設計對白):長毛你死啦, 你屈阿爺!!!

      當然就算ICAC開始調查, 叫長毛協助調查, 他堅持有個國產零零柒同佢講過:"張支票未寫銀碼, 習生叫你識做, " 仲話唔知點解當時一講完呢句就D電子設備壞晒, 我俾唔到録音" 我相信ICAC激到彈起, 都入唔到什麼罪, 包括誹謗

      以上我胡思亂想而已, 不過會否鼓勵政治人物想鼓動民意讚成/反對某議案, 就話"007搵過佢, 唔知佢個名"開脫

      刪除
    3. 如果真有其事,一早就揚哂出嚟,仲使等今時今日。你話個中間人點同佢接頭?佢又點同佢傾?點會無影無蹤,唔通有個茂里喺精神病院走出嚟係街截住長毛同佢咁講,真係咁第二日就賣哂報級喇,仲等乜要等到依家先講?

      刪除
    4. 標少, 正常判斷都知唔會有個007之類同佢講"一億ok?" , 長毛唔笨, 事後我相信也不會告到什麼, 上面我講國產零零柒真的講下笑而已
      只是這種三億一票不少人都當真, 這個我更在意

      刪除
    5. 啲人夾埋做一齣好戲咋或者扮天真囉。

      刪除
    6. 都唔係架, 我身邊有幾個真天真覺得窮得只有錢既阿爺有做過架

      刪除
    7. 咁又係,有人講得出口就有人聽得入耳,否則祈福黨、跌錢黨、電話呃錢黨又點揾到食。

      刪除
    8. 我比較擔心長毛之流食髓知味, 第日唔只007, 隨時話有個姓習既國語人叫佢睇路行都得, 反正精彩就得, 慘得過真有人信, 真係每四年就俾一票佢

      刪除
    9. 細路仔都聽過狼來了,懵盛盛既世路到咗大個都懵盛盛咁,所以就畀狼擔咗囉。

      社會分化到了臨界點,有些事情卻會找出平衡點,所以少擔心喇。

      刪除
  5. Long Hair, the politician, should never have lied, or fabricated a sum which was never mentioned. It made him the joke of the century. It turned him into one disgusting person.

    回覆刪除
  6. 標少,想請教你,如長毛講大話而廉署又立案調查,廉署可否用cap 201 s29 檢控返長毛轉頭呢?謝教!

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 只要長毛不對廉署調查員講大話或者講了不能引證真偽的大話,就怎様也告不到他。他對公眾講大話並不違法。

      刪除
  7. 见成班舔ISIS支共屁眼的支那LAYMEN, 用无比幼稚的问题把BILL耍得团团转的, MARO忍俊不禁啊。:D

    Maro

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 我還以為全國獨立黨有你份,以後看不到你的留言了,珍惜留言的機會呀!不要吝嗇,教下我等一眾門外漢。

      刪除
    2. 4 out of 10 arrested persons have made bail. how serious could the matter be? u tell me, Bill.

      Maro

      刪除
    3. 枉你還指別人是門外漢。

      刪除
    4. Mker, what's the logic? "4 out of 10 arrested persons have made bail" means the matter is not serious? The remaining 6 persons can be completely ignored?

      Why don't you keep your promise that you will leave this blog? Your only meaning of life is to leave feces on this blog?

      刪除
    5. 本土派早幾日才翻某"陽光"放菠蘿的舊帳, 轉頭一句做反有理自己種菠蘿, 跟住一句"CY指使, 黑警老屈, 講完!"就唔使俾追究?
      我應該憤怒定係笑好呢?

      刪除
    6. 佢哋否認有聯系喎。

      刪除
  8. 又關 ISIS 事,未按時食藥的 Mfer 是忍屎不禁吧。

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 支那共产党不就是ISIS吗。 死蠢白痴崽

      Maro

      刪除
    2. Maro: 你這種神神化化瘋瘋癲癲的主義才是ISIS人材, ISIS的名字用在你們這些"勇武"人仕實至名歸, 大陸共產黨一世也比不上你們. "勇武"人仕, 係時候食藥.
      KT

      刪除